Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Mar 9, 2013

#1 : Samsung Galaxy S4


The Samsung Galaxy S3 was arguably the biggest Android phone release to date, so it's hardly surprising that the inevitable S4 is leading the pack as one of the most anticipated phones of 2013. While details on the device remain strictly in rumor mill territory, the best guesses include a 5-inch 1080p HD display, a 13-megapixel camera, and integrated support for Visa wireless payments. But one thing we know for sure: we'll be getting all of the relevant details on March 14 at Manhattan's Radio City Music Hall.

Top 10 most anticipated gadgets of 2013

By: Unknown on: Saturday, March 09, 2013

Dec 22, 2012


Every year we think the evolution in smartphones must have finished. Every year we're wrong. Very wrong.

2012 saw quad-core processors become the norm among the high-end Android world, while Apple finally yielded in the screen size arms race by launching the taller, bigger iPhone 5.

Even Nokia broke a few boundaries with its high-spec imaging technology, sticking unbelievably powerful camera equipment in its latest phones, giving us access to mobile technology that even a couple of years ago would've seemed impossible.

So what can we expect to see in 2013? Will any maker be mad enough to launch a phone with an "octo-core" processor? Will Samsung expand the Galaxy Note's enormous screen by another inch or two, forcing trouser manufacturers the world over to expand pocket sizes accordingly?

Some things are guaranteed. There will be an iPhone update of some sort and Samsung will launch a few thousand differing Galaxy models, but what will be the big movers and publicity-grabbers of the 2013 smartphone scene?

Top 10 trends in smartphones to expect in 2013

By: Unknown on: Saturday, December 22, 2012

Dec 8, 2012



More than likely, Microsoft was very well aware that the Windows 8 UI would be very divisive and would require a massive change in the way a user interface is perceived and what it is supposed to do in various ways.

MIT Professor: Windows 8 is a Christmas Gift for Someone You Hate

By: Unknown on: Saturday, December 08, 2012

Aug 31, 2012



How many of us first started with Nokia? I’m willing to bet that for most of you, a Nokia device was your first mobile phone. Having ‘grown up’ with Nokia phones, I’ve since made the graceful hop to Sony Ericsson then to Android, and it’s never been better. That being said, I still think back fondly, almost like an adolescent love relationship that all of us have had – and still cherish in my heart the time we spent together. However, this broken love is just a remnant from the past, and I, and the market, have affirmed their love for Android. Not everyone has plunged into the ever growing world of Android though, as we are still hearing cases of people going to the extreme, and, in some instances, selling parts of their bodies, or even their virginity to get the latest iDevice.

The Nokia 3310 was my first phone. Unfortunately all that is left of it are entertaining memes on the internet. And, having outgrown dumb phones, Asians – who were once Nokia’s biggest supporters – are disappointed that present day Nokias haven’t brought their once famous durability to their latest devices.

After the 3310, I had the Nokia N95 and the Xpress music 5800, which in my opinion are the best that Nokia has ever produced. Nothing after that mattered. Nokia even had to swallow their pride and admit their failure with the N97. The N8 and N9 came and went – creating little ripples.


Fast forward to 2012, and Nokia is mired by problems more pressing and numerous than ever before. They recently lost their position in the great mobile phone shipment battle to Samsung, while their flagship Nokia Lumia 900 has received mixed reviews. Other problems include: 
It is no surprise that the company is imploding. After all, they jumped from a burning platform to another burning platform.

Here’s why

Nokia Smartphones Don’t Command Value


By this, I meant the selling value. Nokia phones have always been the ‘cheaper’ alternative. In fact, in Asia, the price of WP7 devices halves in 6 months). This is a problem, because it means that they don’t make as much as competitors per smartphone. Being ‘cheaper’ also means that telcos would have to sell in higher volumes to match what they earn from Android and Apple. This is not a good picture.

But there is also a lingering question: will consumers pay less, if and when, access to Android and iPhones are equally affordable? There might be those who would choose Nokia’s ailing phones, but I believe that the number of people who would do this are few. Consequently, telcos shun WP7 because the demand is so low.

What’s worse is that the Ovi Store has been completely removed from Lumia phones. This means that most app revenues have to be shared with Microsoft. There aren’t ways to sideload apps apart from a developer unlocking tool. This may sound irrelevant, but not when you compare how much Apple is making from their apps alone.


Nokia’s decision in going with Windows Phone is costing them more than they bargained for. Plus, Nokia will have to start paying Microsoft for WP7 licensing fees (sooner or later). There is also a question where Elop said WP7 would allow Nokia to differentiate better than competitors. How is it better than Nokia phones running Android?

We will never find out. It’s too late to turn back the clock.

Nokia Products Don’t Inspire Desirability As Others

I consider the late Steve Jobs as a marketing person more than a tech genius. Today, almost every corporation worships the means and methods laid down by Jobs. Others look to the life of Jobs like the way they read Sun Tzu’s, Art of War.

Steve Jobs marketed well, and the results are obvious.

Which brings me to the next question – What is outstanding about Nokia’s advertising and marketing? Most of us will draw a blank when asked this question... That’s a marketing nightmare for Nokia’s marketing people.

That means that Nokia is either not doing enough marketing, or their marketing is so bad, that tech writers like me have no lasting impression of any part of it.

Nokia Is Not Fully Utilizing Their Tech

Nokia is a strong contender in terms of hardware. They were, if I may say, the best from yesteryear. However, hardware makes up a fraction in terms of consumer desirability. The premium smartphone market is the most rewarding, and there are consumers that are willing to pay good money to hold the latest devices in their hands from the tech worlds’ red carpet.

Symbian hasn’t delivered anything on par with iOS and Android, and WP7 is still wallowing slowly in infancy. WP7 isn’t a game changer the way Motorola introduced the original Motorola Droid years ago.

Instead, Nokia’s Lumia range is WP7 slapped on slightly better hardware... It shows.


It Is Too Late For Nokia To Jump On The Android Bandwagon

Let’s imagine for a moment that Nokia decided to go Android.

2012 has arrived and the Nokia has arrived with a quad core processor; packing an 8MP Carl Zeiss lens. Nokia also announced the Nokia Android Pureview – a 41MP, quad core beast that neither Samsung nor HTC has even come close to creating. Nokia Android users gain a whole world of access to apps via the Google Play Store. At that point, Elop has turned the company from the red into piles and piles of green cash. Nokia also holds the title as the manufacturer with the most mobile devices shipped with Samsung at a close second. Nokia continues to pressure HTC to continue bundling Beats Audio headphones with their devices as it launches their new Nokia Android XpressMusic range.

Sounds interesting?

Perhaps... Would Nokia have successfully differentiated themselves from the other phones in the segment – absolutely! Their superior hardware would shine and would put them way ahead of HTC, and possibly enable them to fight Samsung head on.

That hasn’t happened, and going Android now would be too late.

That would be spreading the fire.

Nokia is Now Officially Hopeless !

By: Unknown on: Friday, August 31, 2012

Aug 23, 2012


Microsoft has updated its logo for the first time in 25 years, as the company prepares for a year that will see updates to nearly all of its products.
The logo features the Segoe font and the famous Windows symbol has been squared, with more than a nod towards the all-new user interface of the upcoming Windows 8 and Windows Phone operating systems.

Microsoft New Logo

By: Unknown on: Thursday, August 23, 2012

Aug 22, 2012



Apart from collecting over 70% on each domestically sold Google Android devices, Microsoft is asking for a hefty sum for its very own Windows Phone 7 mobile OS. Such licensing fees have already been estimated at around $10-$15 for every device such as Samsung and HTC. In fact, ZTE has already revealed that they were paying Microsoft between $20 and $30 for each device. This information was revealed by Santiago Sierra, ZTE’s UK Portfolio Manager, during the launch of the ZTE Tania Windows Phone. This is the first time that a manufacturer divulged information on the much speculated licensing figures on the Windows Phone.

To add to this, ZTE also said that creating a Windows Phone is more expensive than an Android because of ‘different cost structure.’ Even though Android has an open-source platform, there are still some implicit costs that are associated to the construction of an Android smartphone.

Once a manufacturer plans to create an Android phone, it can easily get the OS for free. However, it also has to do several legwork tasks; like picking out its hardware and ensuring that the software mixes well with the hardware. Moreover, Google works well and collaborates with different OEMs in order to produce the next best thing in Android smartphone technology.

(Click  to enlarge)

Just a few weeks after Google announced their Motorola acquisition, there were a few leaked slides that showed Google favoring a few device partners (Motorola included) that are specific to Google’s taste. But because there are far too many Android OEMs available, this favoritism is branded as unrealistic and simply a rumor.

On the other hand, when manufacturers create a Windows Phone, they will have to deal with Microsoft’s precise specifications. Microsoft will provide support through the software drivers, code, and its own OS. However, it doesn’t look like the mobile OS is paying off that much yet. Especially with the above licensing fees mentioned, it can be assumed that Windows Phone is off to a slow yet tricky start.

Why Creating an Android Phone is Cheaper than a Windows Phone

By: Unknown on: Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Aug 18, 2012


The Hotmail name has a heritage. It was one of the earliest webmail services and according to Brian Hall, general manager of what's still called the Windows Live team, it's still "the world's largest webmail service". So why do away with the name?


Outlook has a lot of brand recognition too, of course and Hall told TechRadar "we took the best of each of those, but we also recognised that we needed to move on to do something new". That's not just the "modern, clean design" that's intended to work well on smartphones and tablets, but tools to help with the two biggest categories of email we get these days. 

"Email is now only one of the ways people communicate online," Hall points out. "In particular a lot of personal connections have migrated to social networks like Facebook, Twitter or Linked In so we decided to connect those in to Outlook.com in smart ways." 


Updates from social networks are a whopping 17% of all the email people get, according to Hall (we're flattered to see our tweets in his inbox). That's why Outlook.com shows you information about friends from social networks next to their messages, where you can follow them if you don't already and pictures in your address book. 

And the rest? "50% is newsletters, with a growing percentage of those being daily deals, so we saw an opportunity to treat those differently." That means tools to sweep older messages out of your inbox if you want (when that daily deal has expired, say). 

That sounds very like a feature we liked in Hotmail? "We took all the features we knew people really liked forward to Outlook.com," agrees Hall. "Some of the stuff in the releases over the last year including graymail tools, shipping updates, notifications, photo slide shows and the like, aliases as a technology… If we thought something was really good in Hotmail we didn't shy away from moving that forward. But then there's a bunch of stuff that's new." 

An issue of reputation? 

Although Hall doesn't say so, one reason for the name change could be that Hotmail's reputation still suffered from old problems that are long fixed. 

"Certainly we have had some issues with spam" he admits readily. "In 2006, 2007, Hotmail had some challenges with spam. If you look at the spam filters that we have today, that we use and tune through Exchange and Hotmail; as of February we were reviewed as having the best spam protection of any email service. 

"We've taken that technology, improved it with some special sauce that now has been rolled into Outlook and we're pretty confident we have good spam protection." 

Updating the calendar 
Eventually, the Hotmail name will disappear completely. First comes "a beautiful new user interface for SkyDrive that we'll release in the next month". Next is an update to the Hotmail calendar, which has neither the name nor the look of Outlook.com." 

"It's one of the reasons we're referring to Outlook.com as a preview," Hall confides. He doesn't put a date on updating the calendar or on when Microsoft will stop letting you get a new Hotmail address and send everyone to Outlook.com instead. "We have no plans for a long protracted beta or preview. I would imaging we would upgrade the Hotmail base to outlook sometime in the next year but we're not putting a timeframe on it specifically right now." 

The Windows Live name is going away as well; although you'll see lots of references to using a Microsoft account to sign in across Windows, Windows Phone, Xbox and Office 2013, that's not the replacement Hall says. "We offer some great services but we don't have an umbrella concept like Windows Live was before."

Why Hotmail changed its name to Outlook

By: Unknown on: Saturday, August 18, 2012

Aug 15, 2012




Mary Jo Foley of ZDNet reports that the next version of Windows will not be called Windows 9. The news is based on unnamed sources who also claim that an OS update will actually arrive next year, currently codenamed "Blue." So far there's speculation that the update is a Service Pack, or a Feature Pack offering both fixes and new features.



According to a leaked rodmap, Microsoft is expected to release a developer preview for Windows 8 PU -- likely a product update -- during BUILD 2012 in October. The beta is slated to arrive in January 2013 during CES, and enter into Release Candidate mode in April 2013 (formerly during MIX 2013). The RTM version of Windows 8 PU is slated to be released during E3 2013 which coincidentally is the same time Xbox Infinity (aka Loop) is expected to make its public debut. We're betting the two releases will be tied together offering connectivity not possible with Windows 8 and the current Xbox 360.
Even more, Microsoft's roadmap shows a developer preview of Windows 9 scheduled for BUILD 2013. Of course, that doesn't mean the OS will officially be called Windows 9 -- the Redmond company could name it as Windows Infinity for all we know, and is currently using Windows 9 as a codename. This build will reportedly go into beta during CES 2014, Release Candidate in April 2014, and RTM -- along with Internet Explorer 12 -- during Build 2014. There's also a mention of Windows 9M, the launch of Kinect HP2 and an Xbox Infinity product update (PU) in the same late 2014 timeframe.
As the roadmap indicates, Microsoft is moving away with "big bang" Windows releases, and taking the point release approach it's using with Windows Phone, taking notes from Apple. Microsoft may end up renaming "Blue" to Windows 8.1 or Windows 8.5 -- it certainly won't be the first time Microsoft has used a decimal in the Windows label (aka Windows 3.1 etc).
Foley also points out that the "Blue" codename deviates from the city-name pattern that has been used by many Microsoft divisions over the years. However the company recently refrained from using the city-sounding "Metro" label used to describe the Windows 8 UI, possibly due to pressure by one of its partners. That said, the company may simply want to deviate from city-based labels because of the Metro scenario. Than again, Microsoft has used the "Blue" codename before via the Azure and MSN teams.
( Via ZDNet )

Next Windows Won't Be Windows 9 [RUMOR]

By: Unknown on: Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Aug 14, 2012




Microsoft's Windows Phone platform has an equal amount of market share as Samsung's Bada OS... According to Gartner's latest figures, Windows Phone and Bada hold 2.7 per cent of the global mobile device market each.

Samsung's Bada OS growing faster than Windows Phone

By: Unknown on: Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Aug 13, 2012


Microsoft has dropped the ‘Metro’ name used to describe the user interface featuring on Windows 8 desktops, tablets and phones.

The Redmond software company is now branding the tile-based interface as ‘Modern UI’ and maintains that the Metro name was only ever an ‘in-development’ working title.

The bigger picture is that Microsoft was facing a possible trademark dispute with German conglomerate Metro AG, the world’s fifth largest retailer, which claimed to hold rights to the Metro name.

Microsoft has already replaced most references to the Metro UI on most of its websites, and told developers and staff to refrain from using the Metro name last week.

This news, while unlikely to cause any damage to the Windows 8 brand, will be of annoyance of Microsoft. The firm reportedly modelled the Metro name and design on transportation signs in and around Seattle and has long since banded around phrases like the ‘Metro UI, ‘Metro experience’ and ‘Metro style’ online and at Windows 8 launch events.

The Metro name is certainly more catchy than ‘Modern’, although the latter does at least accurately portray an operating system which has been heralded as the most innovative from Microsoft since Windows 95.

Windows 8 is due to go live to the general public on October 26, and has already been released to Microsoft’s manufacturing partners.

Microsoft quietly drops the Metro name for the Windows 8 UI

By: Unknown on: Monday, August 13, 2012

Aug 2, 2012

In anticipation of the final public release of their new all-singing all-dancing Windows 8 operating system, Microsoft has been hard at work behind the scenes deploying their engineering teams into projects that have resulted in the announcement and launch of a range of new mice and keyboards that have been designed to make using Windows 8 a lot easier. The company have called on all of their thirty plus years experience to create hardware which they hope will allow users to get the most out of their new OS and take advantage of everything it provides.

As part of the announcement, Microsoft have informed the public that the new hardware will be available “soon” via the Microsoft online store as well as the official retail channels and other registered Microsoft dealers. Even though Microsoft have high hopes from Windows 8, they obviously also recognize that success is no longer as simple as pumping out a decent version of Windows with more users appreciating the seamless integration of hardware and software which companies like Apple provide. To truly capture the imagination of PC owners, they have acted in the perfect way by creating and announcing this exciting range of mice and keyboards.



Excited users can expect to see two new keyboards hitting the market place when the release switch is eventually flipped, as well as two new corresponding mice that are intended to work as a set. A timely update to their existing Touch Mouse product is also on the cards to bring additional functionality and compatibly with the new Windows 8 software.

The new Wedge Touch Mouse is designed around what Microsoft is calling an ultra compact frame and is predominantly intended to be used in conjunction with a mobile device. With built-in four-way touch scrolling, the product is a perfect example of a functional and highly feature rich mouse for use on the move. The fact that it is Bluetooth enabled means that it will work with any Bluetooth compatible laptop, computer or tablet and remains entirely free from wires. Microsoft have also incorporated BlueTrack technology into the Wedge Touch Mouse as well as a feature that enables the mouse to power cycle in conjunction with the connected machine for battery preservation. When released, the Wedge Touch Mouse will retail for around the $70 mark.





The accompanying Wedge Touch keyboard also offers an enhanced mobile experience with an ultra slim form fact that brings a full-sized keyboard when connected via Bluetooth to a tablet device. The product has integrated support for the use of Hot Keys and media keys to make the experience on a tablet more interactive as well as being lightweight and durable. Microsoft envisage that the Wedge Touch Keyboard will hit the shelves at around the $79.95 price point.



In contrast to the Wedge Touch Keyboard, the new Sculpt Mobile Keyboard brings a more familiar full keyboard type offering but manages to maintain mobility at the same time. The ergonomic design makes it look and feel beautiful with built-in Bluetooth and weighing marginally more than just one pound. Battery saving features enable the keyboard to sleep after detecting no activity, with a simple button tap being enough to wake it up. The Sculpt Touch Mouse is an attempt to bring it all to a mouse experience. 

Portability and comfort compliment a four-way touch scroll strip, allowing power of navigation of apps and documents, and making it a perfect companion for the new Windows 8 Metro stylings. The Sculpt Mobile Keyboard and Touch Mouse will both be priced at $49.95 when launched.



The new hardware announcements from Microsoft look like they have come at a perfect time to take advantage of the Windows 8 buzz and with pre-orders looking likely to start today then they could prove to have some very successful hardware on their hands.

Windows 8 kit from Microsoft ( Mice & Keyboards )

By: Unknown on: Thursday, August 02, 2012

Jul 5, 2012

Home automation technology is here, but hardly anyone uses it. Sure, there are plenty of home automation products, and serious enthusiasts. But the average home remains conspicuously manual. 

To your average Silicon Valley engineer, the reason is obvious: lack of standards. 

The problem is that different home automation products use different, incompatible and often proprietary technologies to make their magic happen. If you buy two products from two companies, they usually won’t work together. Standards groups like Z-Wave and Zigbee Alliance have attempted to create industrywide standards but have been ineffective so far. 

The computer technology companies are now rushing into this vacuum of standards to provide them. Leading the charge is none other than Microsoft. Best known as the maker of the Windows operating system for personal computers, Microsoft views the entire home as a “computer” and is creating an operating system for it. 

Microsoft’s HomeOS, as it's called, is designed to bring law and order to the lawless frontier that is home automation. Perhaps best of all, there are indications that Microsoft's HomeOS will support existing standards, so even home automation products already purchased may work with HomeOS. 


How does HomeOS work? 

Most of us don’t have to think about what makes a computer system succeed, but Microsoft does. 

Computers have an operating system, which is software that orchestrates interaction between the hardware and the application software. For example, you are reading this with a web browser or in a mobile app, both of which are application software programs. This software doesn’t actually put these words on your screen. It sends requests to the operating system, which conjures up all the elements required to display text and photographs on a screen. 

In fact, many of the things that application software appears to do are in fact done by the operating system. 

That’s one of the biggest benefits of Microsoft’s HomeOS. Many of the jobs that home-automation appliances might want to do can be done by HomeOS. Instead of every appliance maker and software maker reinventing the wheel, they can simply make requests of the HomeOS and have the job done for them. 

That means a small company can create an appliance much more easily and reliably. Let’s say, for example, that a company wants to make and sell a lamp that dims when the TV is on. Instead of having to create the technology to know when the TV is on, the lamp maker can simply use the published instructions for HomeOS for being informed by the system when the TV is on. 

A standardized platform promotes the automation of homes by making it easier for companies to make home automation products. 

The idea is that Microsoft will try to convince home-automation companies to create both hardware and software that supports HomeOS. Consumers will buy these products, which are likely to include all the things one might automate: sprinklers, lights, home-entertainment systems, fans, doorbells, heaters, air conditioners, coffee makers, dishwashers, robotic vacuum cleaners and home security systems. 

In addition to products that support HomeOS, you would buy a server, which would be a small computer system that everything would connect to, mostly wirelessly. You would control your home automation with a smart phone. This actually improves the experience, because as this image shows, you can see camera feeds on your phone, which is probably always going to be with you. 

And finally, the coolest thing of all: a HomeOS app store. 


The HomeOS app store 

So you’ve got your HomeOS server, and you’ve got some devices that support HomeOS. Now what? Microsoft is planning to offer a HomeOS app store, where you can browse and download software that will automate your home. 

This makes sense coming from the world's largest software company. This screen capture shows a control panel, where you can check the status of all smart devices in the house. This wasn't created by Microsoft, but by a supporting partner for another platform that Microsoft makes. A "control panel" category of apps is just one that will exist in the HomeOS app store. 

For example, some company might offer an app that puts the video feed from your security system up on the TV when it detects motion. Another company might offer software that sends you a text message when someone comes to your door. Another might develop software that plays music based on who’s in the room (by detecting your cell phone). 

Nobody knows what applications will be available on the HomeOS app store. And that’s the point. Hundreds or thousands of software makers can offer more variety than any one company alone. 

As one example of a very friendly application, Microsoft researchers are developing something called HomeMaestro. 


The HomeMaestro idea 

A Microsoft research project called HomeMaestro is working on making it easier to control devices in your home. 

The approach uses regular language, rather than complex controls. The idea is an old-fashioned if-then statement common to basic software programming: If something happens, then make something else happen. 

In a video demonstration, HomeOS researchers use the simple example of: “If I open the door, then turn on the light.” This command is called a rule, and it’s controlled on your smart phone. 

The HomeMaestro project does a neat trick. As you build these rules, you use the action to inform the app. For example, you tell the app to create a rule. Then you open the door manually. “The door opens” appears in the top box. 

Then you click on the Then box, and turn on the lamp. “Turn on the lamp” appears in the Then box. You save your rule, and automation has been set. In the future, when you open the door, the lamp will turn on. 

The HomeMaestro project would have all home automation work this way — by example. 

While the door-and-lamp example is very simple, the rules for home automation could be very complex: If I watch a show, don’t record it. If the air temperature outside is below 50 degrees between the hours of 6 a.m. and 8 a.m., turn on and warm up the car when I make coffee. When everyone is in bed, turn off all the downstairs lights and appliances. 

The possibilities are endless. Especially since the HomeMaestro project envisions social sharing of rules — a "rules store" where you can browse and download rules created by others for your own use. 

So when is HomeOS coming home? 

Microsoft has been developing HomeOS for years and has been testing HomeOS in real homes. It's called on students and Microsoft programmers to create apps for the HomeOS app store. 

So far, Microsoft has not announced a product release date, pricing or other details, so that means we won’t see products on the market this year. However, with other competitors also preparing similar offerings, including search engine giant Google, I would be surprised if next year didn't see a big launch of the new Microsoft HomeOS product, and a tsunami of home appliances that support it.

For more information about this click here

Home Automation Technology Is Here !

By: Unknown on: Thursday, July 05, 2012

Jul 4, 2012


Canada’s long-time technology standard bearer, RIM -aka BlackBerry- , is fighting for survival amidst dismal sales and waning consumer interest. With the release of BlackBerry 10 and the accompanying new hardware now pushed back to early 2013 — a full year later than it was originally promised — things don’t look good. 

With an uneasy board feeling the ever-increasing heat (surely at Robot Devil levels now) from investors, RIM is now feeling the pressure to consider all possible options to right the ship. On that list: getting into bed with Microsoft. 

The relationship could take a number of forms, of course. There’s no doubt that Microsoft would love to acquire a good chunk of RIM’s patent portfolio. Doing so would further protect Windows Phone and give Microsoft additional ammunition in its ongoing licensing “skirmishes” with Android OEMs. Another option would be a Nokia-style collaboration. RIM’s board is reportedly not too keen on giving up the amount of control they’d be required to if Microsoft were to buy a stake in the company and kick in for R&D and marketing expenses. 

And don’t forget about Windows Phone 8. RIM could stop developing their own mobile OS, thereby allowing more time and effort to be devoted to higher-margin enterprise products and services. 

Would that really be a good idea, though? With an uncertain future and no new OS for at least six months, it’s hard to imagine that competing against HTC and Samsung with Windows Phone 8 would really be any harder than competing with them using an OS that most of the western world has already lost interest in.

BlackBerry going out of business

By: Unknown on: Wednesday, July 04, 2012

Dec 28, 2011

I remember when years ago people were hoping that Linux would end Windows’ domination in the market place, especially with a crippled Apple at the beginning of last decade. Linux, an open source OS, was our last chance for that happening, at least back then. But Microsoft made sure nothing would be threatening their monopoly, and over the years they made deals in such a way that manufacturers were compelled to use Windows anyway. Add to that the fact that they’d rather turn a blind eye to the piracy in Asia and other poor countries, and have Windows on every machine there, than force them to choose the free Linux, and help Linux rise as a popular consumer OS, which would’ve meant a lot of popular programs would’ve been on it, too, and it would’ve become a real choice against Windows.

So after a decade of failed attempts to usurp Windows’ domination, you’d think that there’s no way for any other OS to beat it. But I’d argue that both iOS and Android have shown that there is place in the world for other operating systems, that could eventually threaten its domination. Microsoft tried to fight against this with WP7 and now Windows 8, but we’ve already seen that WP7 was too late to market, still stagnating at 1% market share, and I believe Windows 8 for tablets will suffer a similar fate, although probably not as bad. What’s worse, is that I think Windows 8 itself also poses a huge risk to the Windows domination.

Too Little Too Late

A new research from Forrester says that consumer interest in a Windows tablets has dropped almost in half since last year, from 46% to 25%. To be honest, I’ve always thought that people were crazy about wanting Windows on a tablet in the first place. It’s been on the market for almost a decade and it never caught on, in part because of the expensive x86 battery burning chips, that made the tablets last too little on a charge, and in part because Windows and the programs running on it were made for the mouse, not touch. The drop in interest shows that more and more people are understanding this today than they did a year ago.

But now you’d say that Windows 8 is optimized for touch, so the interest should rise high again, right? Well not so fast. The very reason so many people believed in a Windows tablet in the first place, was 1) because it’s the only OS they knew, and 2) because they thought they’d be using all those Windows programs on it. But as I said, they are now coming to the realization those programs would’ve never been a good experience on a tablet anyway.

But if the main reason for using a Windows tablet in the first place is gone, then why would they even want one now, especially when, unlike in the early 2000′s, you now have real alternatives in iOS/iPad and Android tablets. The reason to get a Windows 8 tablet now is certainly a lot less compelling than when Windows was the only OS most people knew, and the only OS that could give them the apps/programs they needed. The situation has radically changed now, and instead of being in a leading position, Windows 8 will have to catch up in touch optimized apps with iOS and Android, which both have hundreds of thousands of applications in their ecosystems.

Plus, it’s going to be almost 2 years before we even see Windows 8 ARM-based machines according to Digitimes, who say Windows ARM notebooks aren’t coming until mid 2013. We’re already seeing Android ARM “notebooks” (think Transformer) today, so Microsoft will be 2 years behind the competition again.

Losing Domination in PC’s

Some people seem to think that because Windows 7 has sold 400 million licenses so far, it means Windows 8 will automatically sell just as many or maybe even more. I disagree with that. Windows 8 is in a way a big disruption to the Windows  ecosystem (as are Android and iOS), and like all disruptions, it means its most loyal customers will not like it at first. This is why Steve Ballmer said a year ago that Windows 8 is the riskiest thing they’ve done, because it actually is very risky, and it could kill their entire domination.

I’ve heard many people already saying how they just want to turn off the tile interface when they use it on a PC, because it gets in the way of them getting things done the way they are used to, and it slows them down in many cases. For example, you won’t even be able to use Youtube with its main Flash player when you use the tile interface, which is the default one. Sure, some people will switch to the HTML5 version of Youtube, which doesn’t look as good or work as well right now. But most people will use that default interface and realize that Youtube is not working. Should they just go back to the “old interface” every time they want to watch a Youtube video? This is just one example of how the new interface will annoy a lot if not most current Windows PC users.

Even the enterprise market is reluctant to switch to Windows 8, because they think it would interfere too much with their work flow and how they do things. Also a lot of enterprise developers supports .NET and they are still angry about Microsoft choosing to focus so much on HTML5 for Windows 8. This is what happens when a product is disruptive. It just chases away most of your current user base who are used to doing things a certain way.

The part that Windows 8 is disruptive is not bad by itself. The bad part is that it’s disruptive AND late. Meego was a disruptive modern OS, too, just like Android and iOS. If Nokia used it in 2009, it would’ve had a fighting chance, and maybe Nokia would be in a different position right now. But using it in 2011? Forget about it. It’s way too late. And Windows 8 (and WP7) have been late in exactly the same way.

A Moment of Joy

Should we feel sorry for Windows losing its monopoly status? No. We finally got what we wanted – true OS competition between Android, iOS and now Windows 8. I don’t think Windows 8 will share WP7′s fate of reaching only 1% market share. Far from it. But I also don’t think they’ll ever again have that 90% market share, whether we’re talking PC’s, tablets or other kind of devices. And I think about an equal market share between Windows, Android and iOS is exactly what we should be wishing for.

We can look forward to both Android and iOS becoming more work-oriented tools in the coming years. We’re already starting to see a glimpse of that with the upcoming Asus Transformer Prime, and I’m willing to bet Apple will release something similar either next year or in 2013

Windows 8... The Next Vista

By: Unknown on: Wednesday, December 28, 2011

 
Copyright © @AndroidBasha's Blog